|
challange for 2nd
#6050
03/07/04 10:08 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
pin4u2
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23 |
I have been watching kids wrestling for several, and in so many cases I have seen the State Championship wrestled in the semi Finals and you see a war in the Semi's and then you see the finals finished in 30 seconds. Why do we not have a challange for second, like most very big and successful tournaments have?
I say let the kids challange what do you think?
|
|
|
Re: challange for 2nd
#6051
03/08/04 03:17 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
matdawg
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81 |
Yes, i agree with you. That has happend many times. I think why they don't is the time it takes up. However, you would think big tournaments would have challenges for second.
|
|
|
Re: challange for 2nd
#6052
03/08/04 11:00 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,459
Husker Fan
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,459 |
What you are describing happened to my son two years ago at State. He only lost twice that entire year and it was to the same kid the State champ and winner of a Triple Crown Series (two Tulsa tournaments and Reno). He lost to him 6-2 in the State semi-finals. They both went on to pin their final and third place opponents early in the first period. My son had never faced the 2nd place wrestler all year. He felt strongly that he should have had the opportunity to wrestle for second that day.
On the other side of the argument the second place wrestler might not really be up for another match after just losing a hard fought State title match. Last year my son came back in the last 40 seconds to win a hard fought State final 2-1 with a takedown. His opponent was a very good sport at the end but he was understandably very disappointed as my son would have been if the result had been the other way around. I believe this is also another situation where the 2nd and 3rd place wrestler had not met in the tournament because my son wrestled the third place wrestler in the semis. I think it would have been difficult for the wrestler who lost the final to come back with his best effort in another match.
I would like to hear from some wrestlers who have actually been in a second place challenge. How do they feel about it?
Vince Nowak Kansas College Wrestling Fund Supporter Please join the fight with your contributions
|
|
|
Re: challange for 2nd
#6053
03/08/04 11:45 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
TRAVIUS.com
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275 |
I like the idea but I'll say that you wrestle for FIRST and in someway SECOND OR THIRD just isn't the same... plus I don't see a reason to have a match 30 minutes after a FINAL. But I honestly do like the theory of havin a true second and third place.
Its not over yet...
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
146
guests, and 4
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics36,056
Posts250,665
Members12,302
|
Most Online1,305 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|