Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
challange for 2nd #6050 03/07/04 10:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
P
pin4u2 Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
P
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
I have been watching kids wrestling for several, and in so many cases I have seen the State Championship wrestled in the semi Finals and you see a war in the Semi's and then you see the finals finished in 30 seconds. Why do we not have a challange for second, like most very big and successful tournaments have?

I say let the kids challange what do you think?

Re: challange for 2nd #6051 03/08/04 03:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
M
matdawg Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 81
Yes, i agree with you. That has happend many times. I think why they don't is the time it takes up. However, you would think big tournaments would have challenges for second.

Re: challange for 2nd #6052 03/08/04 11:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,459
H
Husker Fan Offline
Member
Offline
Member
H
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,459
What you are describing happened to my son two years ago at State. He only lost twice that entire year and it was to the same kid the State champ and winner of a Triple Crown Series (two Tulsa tournaments and Reno). He lost to him 6-2 in the State semi-finals. They both went on to pin their final and third place opponents early in the first period. My son had never faced the 2nd place wrestler all year. He felt strongly that he should have had the opportunity to wrestle for second that day.

On the other side of the argument the second place wrestler might not really be up for another match after just losing a hard fought State title match. Last year my son came back in the last 40 seconds to win a hard fought State final 2-1 with a takedown. His opponent was a very good sport at the end but he was understandably very disappointed as my son would have been if the result had been the other way around. I believe this is also another situation where the 2nd and 3rd place wrestler had not met in the tournament because my son wrestled the third place wrestler in the semis. I think it would have been difficult for the wrestler who lost the final to come back with his best effort in another match.

I would like to hear from some wrestlers who have actually been in a second place challenge. How do they feel about it?


Vince Nowak
Kansas College Wrestling Fund Supporter
Please join the fight with your contributions

Re: challange for 2nd #6053 03/08/04 11:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
T
TRAVIUS.com Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 275
I like the idea but I'll say that you wrestle for FIRST and in someway SECOND OR THIRD just isn't the same... plus I don't see a reason to have a match 30 minutes after a FINAL. But I honestly do like the theory of havin a true second and third place.


Its not over yet...

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 146 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
bvswwrestling, CoachFitzOS, Dluce, Shawn Russell, CorbinPickerill
12302 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics36,056
Posts250,665
Members12,302
Most Online1,305
Mar 13th, 2025
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,259
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.033s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7613 MB (Peak: 0.8455 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-09 16:08:56 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS