Not a bad 6A dual team!

103 - Vesta
112 - Deshazer
119 - Barber
125 - McCormick
130 - Maple
135 - Means
140 - Caldwell
145 - Houlden
152 - Fisher
160 - Bonewell
171 - Beard
189 - Baker
215 - Caylor
285 - Andrus

Stokes from 5A beat Deshazer.

And Stokes was beaten by Slyter in 4A, but Slyter has been beaten twice by Callahan in 4A. I think he is just trying to get some conversation regarding how each would look had we put a dual team together for each class.

Stokes can't technically wrestle on the 6A dual team.

5A dual team:

103 - Smith
112 - Wauer
119 - Keller
125 - Keller
130 - Graham
135 - Crank
140 - Isenberg
145 - Arnold
152 - Detmer
160 - Curtis
171 - Elliott
189 - Cotton
215 - Bach
285 - Disney

I guess you beat me to my dual team.

4A Dual team:

103 - Ornellas
112 - Callahan
119 - Ribelin
125 - Cox
130 - Noblet
135 - Napier
140 - Naylor
145 - Sommer
152 - Watson
160 - Thoman
171 - Kriss
189 - Heckel
215 - Kober
285 - Hilley

We could do that after Grand State if KSHSASAAASHAA wasn't so meddlesome except that we are in 4 different venues. ChaChing!

Team 6A - 27
Team 4A - 15

Who said 6A was weaker than 4A?

Team 5A - 30
Team 6A - 16

Team 5A - 32
Team 4A - 15

321A wrestles the winner...

Team 5A - 39
Team 321A - 9

How do we determine the winner? This seems like a railroad job to me.

Run through the dual yourself. Be honest and you will end up close to those numbers.

All of a sudden, just because of one loss to Wauer, he is better than Stokes? Kids get caught in bad position, and upsets happen. I'd still stick Stokes in that 5a lineup. Wauer is a great, tough wrestler, and an upstanding kid; I mean absolutely no disrespect, it was a huge win for him!

Those are probably pretty close numbers for duel results. I don't think it will matter who you put into the 112 class. This year, 5A appears to be the toughest. However, I believe we would all agree that 6A was the weakest last year. Too bad we can't watch them all at one site at a combined state tournament. Sorry, just a sore subject for me.

Interesting comment about Stokes.

Yeah, going back and re-reading my post, I see now how that could look 'interesting.' Again, this is just speculation, and opinion; please do not take my comments as an affront to any wrestler's ability or character. These conversations are what make this forum fun (as long as they are taken with a grain of salt, and stay civil).

That's the beauty of rankings. Stokes will have his chance to climb back in it. Everyone that has seen him wrestle knows he can beat anyone on a given day.

Agreed, and I am only referring to the theoretical 5A dual lineup in my posts here.