Participation Numbers by District
#185360
03/03/11 10:14 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,248
smokeycabin
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,248 |
FYI - Just curious
D I South - 587 North - 607
D II South - 450 North - 555
D III East - 491 West - 478
D IV North - 383 South - 452
DI - 1,194 DII - 1,005 DIII - 969 D IV - 835
Totals - 4003 participants
587 14.7% 607 15.2% 450 11.2% 555 13.9% 491 12.3% 478 11.9% 383 9.6% 452 11.3% 4003 100.0%
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: smokeycabin]
#185429
03/04/11 01:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 71
smithy
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 71 |
We really need to even those numbers up. I realize the numbers change every year but D1 and D2 have been stacked for several years now. Just a thought.
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: smithy]
#185592
03/05/11 03:33 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 122
jule
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 122 |
Hmmmm let me see. Everyone on here is telling the Guymon 8 you don't like it move to Kansas. Don't like your district numbers move to another district. That would fix all your problems right.
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: smithy]
#185628
03/05/11 07:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 31
Jamie Davis
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 31 |
One of the reason for alot of D2 being stacked is all of the population in the area. Have a greater number of wrestlers to choose from because of higher numbers and partcipation. That is just my thought on why you have so many quality wrestlers from area? No different in other sports you get a larger pool to choose from.
Jamie Davis Andover, Kansas
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: Jamie Davis]
#185913
03/07/11 03:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 71
smithy
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 71 |
I am not complaining. My children have done well in District 2. Just thought evening the districts would be good for all. We border district 1 anyway so it wouldn't matter there either. Good luck to all in the next three weeks.
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: smithy]
#186018
03/08/11 01:41 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933
Brent Lane
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933 |
We border district one, and in fact have to travel further to get to our sub district than it would had we been a part of district 1. My thoughts are if you qualify in district 2 chances are you are pretty good.
"If it is to be, it is up to me!"
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: Brent Lane]
#186030
03/08/11 04:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 272
dagwood
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 272 |
We border district one, and in fact have to travel further to get to our sub district than it would had we been a part of district 1. My thoughts are if you qualify in district 2 chances are you are pretty good. No matter what district you are in if you qualify for state the chances are you are pretty good.
Darren Newton
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: dagwood]
#186084
03/08/11 08:12 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933
Brent Lane
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 933 |
We border district one, and in fact have to travel further to get to our sub district than it would had we been a part of district 1. My thoughts are if you qualify in district 2 chances are you are pretty good. No matter what district you are in if you qualify for state the chances are you are pretty good. True.
"If it is to be, it is up to me!"
|
|
|
Re: Participation Numbers by District
[Re: Brent Lane]
#186101
03/08/11 11:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,143
HEADUP
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,143 |
the only numbers that matter now are......top 4, top 4, and top 6.
"with attitude, will, and some spirit"
|
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
285
guests, and 2
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics36,049
Posts250,641
Members12,302
|
Most Online1,305 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|