I'm not trying to start a fight... they are just numbers... I too beat this horse many times about who's better than who, the point is these are the records and they are just there to show this, I wasn't slanting the thing one way or the other. The "best" class thing was just the lowest number of losing records not the "best" class as terms of wrestling. They are just for fun enjoy them.... and I was bored tonight.
Alex,
It is hard for me to believe that you did not have a motive when you started this topic. Several years ago I did an analysis of the year in school of each of state placers by weight. As expected 103 and 112 had very large percentages of freshmen and sophomores as placers in contrast to 215 and 275 at the time that had very high percentages of juniors and seniors. I was not just trying to provide information. My motives were that I was trying to throw support about the need for more weight classes for heavier wrestlers and also to give support to a topic about whether it was just as difficult for a heavier wrestler to win three state titles as for a lighter wrestler to win four. I think most people reading this topic can see you had a motive in introducing the topic.
