Originally Posted By: Bronco Wrestler
321A
103- 3
112- 2
189- 1
215- 1
285- 1
Total- 8

4A
119- 1
125- 1
135- 1
145- 1
152- 1
Total- 5

5A
103- 3
112- 3
119- 1
125- 1
135- 2
140- 1
145- 1
152- 3
160- 2
171- 2
189- 3
215- 1
285- 2
Total- 25

6A
103- 4
112- 1
119- 2
125- 2
130- 3
135- 4
140- 2
145- 4
152- 1
160- 3
171- 1
215- 5
Total 32

321A 8 = 3.5% of qualifiers have losing records
4A 5 = 2.2% of qualifiers have losing records
5A 25 = 11.1% of qualifiers have losing records
6A 32 = 14.2% of qualifiers have losing records

So "Best" Class in '06-'07
4A
321A
5A
6A

These are based off the records in the State Brackets but I know they aren't all right, and I also didn't count the .500 records so these are truely losing records. Just thought since no one had done it yet this year I thought I would.


Alex,

I was looking over the other topic you introduced and I noticed from this analysis that you provided us that the results do not seem to support your opinion that there is a lack of depth in the heavyweight class this year. In 3-2-1A only 1 of the 8 with a losing record was a heavyweight. In 4A none of the five with losing records were heavyweights. In 5A only 2 of the 25 with losing records were heavyweights. In 6A zero of the 32 with losing records were heavyweights.

Using the same logic that you used to say that this analysis shows that the best class in 06-07 was 4A, then 321A, then 5A and followed by 6A, I would have to conclude that it also shows that heavyweight class compares very well in depth this year to some of the other weight classes.


Vince Nowak
Kansas College Wrestling Fund Supporter
Please join the fight with your contributions