140:
1. Tyler Caldwell - 11 - GD
2. Aldon Isenberg - 12 - GE
I am curious as to the reasoning behind this. Can you explain? I don't want to argue; rankings like this (without head to heads) are somewhat pointless IMO, just looking for the justification.
You may also want to take a look at 160. Greg Curtis pinned Rosenhamer at Newton, as stated by Aldon Isenberg135 further up the thread.
I am a huge fan of both of these kids and can tell you there would be one seat taken on the first row to see them wrestle. National ranking services (which are certainly not all created equal) play a part in determining their seeds. So as to your "pointless" reference, I don't think it's void of merit. I believe it just adds motivation and provides for a bigger stage in which the top wrestlers can settle things on the mat. It is not my intention to slight anyone, however it is just my opinion until proven otherwise.
