I also agree. If a wrestler is better on his feet then it's his choice to pick top, bottom, or neutral. I think what everyone here is talking about is the wrestler who is obviously superior in every aspect of wrestling. The people I'm talking about aren't the ones who barely get by. They're the ones who consistently take down their opponent, tilt them for 2 or 3 back points, then LET them up. The entire time they do this they are watching the score and somehow with their inferior mat skills miraculously seem to pin their opponent just a point or two shy of a tech fall. I think this is the wrestler that bothers a lot of us.