Oh boy, now I don't mind these discussions. I am working on the video of the match, and will type a longer response at the other forum to detail what happened. I will say this, two officals, one on the mat, one mat side, did not see indication of a bite, in fact, the video will show this decision was very quick. The head official was called to the mat, and also, made a very quick decision that there were not bite marks. The Official of the Tournament, Denny from Kansas, (way to go) was there, and he didn't see a bite. On this note, he was sitting to the right of the table watching the match, and I was in the right corner as the camera will show the match, this is critical as you will see the boys were facing us.

Keith did have Nathan in a very tight head scissors with his hands around Nathan's throat and face, again, I'll give the kid credit, he kept the pressure on. Bottom line, I didn't see a bite, at least one other official matside didn't see a bite, the official on the mat didn't see a bite or an indication of a bite, and neither did the head official who was called to the table. As to the rest of the things mentioned in the thread at Illinois Matman, I'll respond more after I can post the video for evidence of my points, with the exception of what occured after the match, and thankfully there are a number of witnesses including one of the tournament directors who saw everything and can verify everything I say if need be. Again, don't mind these discussions as it is about a wrestling match, and I think Mr. Serber and his son will be very surprised at what I do say as I have nothing but the utmost respect for them, again, as one of the tournament directors could verify as he was there and was the one that asked Mr. Surber to leave.