After visiting the site I came across this post. I looked at the video of this match. Just to clarify a few things.

The wrestler in question is a first year wrestler, who weighed in at 169 lbs. Now as a former wrestler both high school, colliagiately, and former high school coach Kansas Class 5a it would seem that the other by with 2-3 years experience and I guess outweighed the other boy by atleast 20 lbs. would first of all have the advantage.
If a wrestler is stalling there are qualified referees to issue the appropriate penalty.
If the score was 9-2 I think the winning wrestler must have been engaged in aggressive attack.
The take down was a lateral throw and then followed up with a running half nelson, this is also not a stalling tactic. You cant stall when you are laying on somebody�s chest.
The best way to defeat a stalling wrestler is to push so hard that there no question of stalling. That means both wrestlers were in one of three states. (1) both stalling (2) both out of shape (3) both so dog tired from doing there very best they just could not go anymore.
If you are not an Olympic Chamnpion, or atleast this caliber I would plan on losing at some point in my career, even the best will eventually lose if they hang around long enough. Don�t enable your wrestler to use whinning and complaining as a crutch, watch the film and learn how can I beat this guy next time. Its not what you are its what you become. Be a positive influence to the kids in wrestling or you yourself an avid wresler , fan, parent or whatever bring the whole sport down, I would apologize to my son for giving him excuses.