Having "no dog in this fight", I nonetheless decided to weigh in after Cokely reminded me of 1wrestle's earlier remarks.

Keenly aware that 1wrestle would never do anything to "tarnish the freedom of speech", he professes to so cherish (as Cokely reminded me), I decided to "waste a little more oxygen", and suggest to 1wrestle that, from my vantage point, Mr. Luedke appeared to be simply exercising that "freedom of speech", which 1wrestle so cherishes.

I'd also note that by virtue of Mr. Luedke disclosing his name to his post, that he, at least, in some measure, has the courage of his convictions.

By 1wrestle's earlier remarks, it strikes me that, in 1wrestle's estimation, "freedom of speech" is only "tarnished", when someone is "moronic" enough to disagrees on a matter with the patriotic and intellectual poster known to this post as "1wrestle".

O, and by the way 1wrestle: Svo69 is not slang for moron.