Wrestling Talk Forums supported
USA Wrestling-Kansas KWCA Wrestling Talk Forums supported & maintained by USA Wrestling-Kansas USAW USA Wrestling-Kansas 
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: "bumble" beasley] #130949 08/26/08 12:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 372
S
shawnbudke Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 372
Hey guys,

Just want to clear something up about the Montana system of using the varsity and jv to qualify for state.....

The reason MT does that for their AA schools (same as 6A in KS) is because they only have 13 AA schools. So in order to have full 16 man brackets at the state tournament, that is the system they implemented. Way back in the OLD days (when I was there) we had 16 AA teams and we only took varsity wrestlers to the state tournament.

Having said that, when I first saw the system I was skeptical of it. I thought the same things about going overboard to let everyone qualify, etc. Once I saw it in action, I changed my opinion, mainly because I saw how it helped in a lot of cases on reducing the weight cutting. For example, if a team had 2 of the top kids in the state at one weight, they would wrestle one up a weight for the majority of the season. At state they would put both wrestlers at the same weight. This really helped the kid that was one of the top 2 wrestlers in the state in that he could still place at the state tournament, yet he didn't have to wrestle up a weight or try to really cut to make the next lower weight.

Shawn Budke

Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: "bumble" beasley] #130953 08/26/08 02:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
Cokeley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
Unless Cody switches to Swiss Cake Rolls I think he will be wrestling 135 but I wouldn't be surprised to see him at 140. All fun aside, he will be super tough no matter what weight he wrestles and I would consider him a contender for the top spot on the podium.


Will Cokeley
(708)267-6615
willcokeley@gmail.com
Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: Cokeley] #130970 08/27/08 09:23 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 35
J
Jason McComb Offline
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 35
Will-
Sorry I should of responded to your funny "Hunny Buns" comment on this thread. My fault, keep up the good work. I respond on the Derby Line up thread. Have a Great Day!!!

Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: "bumble" beasley] #131060 09/04/08 02:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 40
"
"bumble" beasley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
"
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 40
Change that, Beasley is at Campus

Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: "bumble" beasley] #131061 09/04/08 02:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,474
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,474
Originally Posted By: codybeasley
Change that, Beasley is at Campus


Wrong Cody, Cody. Shavlik is from Derby.


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: Chief Renegade] #131062 09/04/08 02:37 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 40
"
"bumble" beasley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
"
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 40
I'm talking about me,
Cody Beasley is at Campus ha

Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: "bumble" beasley] #131065 09/04/08 03:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,474
C
Chief Renegade Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,474
That is funny. On your own post you claimed Maize. Did you just switch back?


Eric Johnson


Acts 4:12


Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: Chief Renegade] #131083 09/05/08 06:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 40
"
"bumble" beasley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
"
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 40
yeah i switched back

Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: Falcon Grappler] #131139 09/11/08 02:41 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 138
B
bighead Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 138
Originally Posted By: Falcon Grappler
I don't believe allowing two guys at a weight is a proper solution to the problem. In my opinion, lets drop a middle weight and add 235 or 240 and allow for more of those kids to show up. If I really had my way, I would just drop 103 period for the fact that the majority of kids entering high school and attending high school have to still make a big cut to make 103. Kids are bigger now as their diets make them bigger.

Drop 103 Add 235

Also: If I have a suprise high profile move in coming will someone please let me know! I work at this school daily and have heard no such news!!!! I'll take one if one of them happens to move into my area though wink tounge in cheek!!!!!


You want more slower paced, out of shape, pummling, unimpressive wrestling? Im sorry but I lose interest after 189. Ive also noticed most people have hit the parking lot by 171. I can name some very talented 103 KS wrestlers... Roberson, Maynes(100lbs), Bunch, and possibly a few of your kids. A whole bunch of 4xrs started their hs careers at 103. Remember that these KIDS are 14-18 years old. There was thought and reason put into the weight classifications. Im sorry but 215+ pound high schoolers bore me!

Re: 6A Returning SQ's [Re: bighead] #131142 09/11/08 12:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
Cokeley Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,327
12 of the 22 four time Kansas Class State Champs won their first championship at 105 or less (98, 103, and 105) so lets leave that alone. It is the only REAL atheletic opportunity for the small freshman or sophomore.


Will Cokeley
(708)267-6615
willcokeley@gmail.com
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Nate Naasz, RedStorm 

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 285 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
bvswwrestling, CoachFitzOS, Dluce, Shawn Russell, CorbinPickerill
12302 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics36,049
Posts250,641
Members12,302
Most Online1,305
Mar 13th, 2025
Top Posters(All Time)
usawks1 8,595
smokeycabin 6,248
Aaron Sweazy 5,259
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.2
(Release build 20190702)
PHP: 7.2.34 Page Time: 0.039s Queries: 15 (0.006s) Memory: 0.7963 MB (Peak: 0.9488 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-03-15 07:58:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS