As I asked the question about Tanner to begin with, I want to make sure everyone knows I was not saying anything negative about Woten. Since Richard the Great commented on a previous post that he had something to do with getting Woten disqualified, I figured it was unfair. But, the question is still not answered, what is the logic?? Was this done to make up for what happened at state. I know Tanner and have seen him wrestle and believe he is deserving. I do not know Woten, but believe what others say that he is deserving. But, Tanner is the 285. The point is what is the criteria, who makes the decision. As I would hate for them to ruin this kid's day and change thing, I hope the decision works out well. But, the decision appears political and lets hope it doesn't happen next year.