Pretty much sums it up right there ha ha ha great work man!
Doesn't sum anything up. If you really believe that you don't know much.
This is not an appropriate measure to just throw out and compare one class to the other.
This is a very valid statement.
The problem with the two large classes is that there are only 32 programs in each classification. This cuts down the amount of winning records that would be in a bracket at regionals and enables more losing records to squeeze through.
This is not.
The problem with the two "large classes" is not there's only 32 teams. It is there's always 2 jacked up regionals. This happens every year because the association refuses to seed regionals in wrestling.
What is appropriate to say about 321A and 4A is that it is much more difficult to qualify to state than 5A and 6A. This is because of the sheer size of brackets 16 plus kids versus 8 or less.
No!, it is not appropriate to say this. There are kids that are not going to state that where in the NW Wichita regional or the Bishop Carroll regional that would qualify in just about any other region regardless of class. Tell them it's easier when they have already beaten 4A/3A kids that are going. They would love to have been in 4A or 3A. And I looked at the brackets and they don't all have 16, especially in 3A, some had 10, not much different than 8 huh. Anyway, it is not the quantity of kids in a bracket that makes it tough, it is the quality. It all comes down to which region and which weight. That is what determines who goes to state.
