If you seen my earlier post, we didn't go in to this blind. No one is being overlooked. That is the beauty of it wrestling good kid's back to back. My question is why is there a problem with him going 64? Tell me what you think? Mason shouldn't be at 64. Is the idea of a kid from a 58 weight pound class coming to 64 put a black eye on 64, are you saying he isn't good enough ?Regardless he is still 64, win or lose. Just because traditionally everyone goes back a weight class, we didn't. We are here to wrestle. Park city was enough also. I know Gowin and Steele wasn't there along with many more who wasn't. Look at it this way everyone in 64 is starting out with an advantage.


J. Turner