There was no disrespect intended towards Salisbury. He is a stud. He's in the discussion of being the top 1 or 2 182 pounders in kansas High-school wrestling. That is a great accomplishment! People can disagree with each other on this forum without going at each others necks. After reading chiefs criteria for ranking Salisbury #1, I think he got it right once again proving he's the best at what he does.
Originally Posted By: Beeson
I agree, questioning rational is not being disrespectful. It's not like most of the comments were saying Trent sucked. They were debating who they thought was better. Any time wrestlers are ranked without head to head it is hard to say who the better wrestler is. I don't think disrespect was meant on either part, just good discussion. It's ok to root for one over the other.
If you guys would have read the quote above my post you would have seen the comment that Trent's criteria was only that he attends SJA.
Originally Posted By: ksuwrestling2
Of course I mean a win in the current season. So according to you all a head to head win over a wrestler in the current season doesn't mean anything.
Tyson,
I've never taken a shot at anyone that didn't do it to me first. I'll treat you how you treat me.
Tryingtobesilent, Wuthnow is not from SJA. That is the real criteria here.
That is an insult to both Trent and Eric Johnson. Of course I could have just considered the source and ignored it but my dislike for Steve grows every time he crawls out from under the rock he lives beneath.
Tryingtobebutnotbeingsilent, I am still confused. Did you think that Wuthnow had a win this season over Salsbury?? Head to head s always the number one criteria until you have the triangle of confusion where three guys all beat each other.
