Opinion should never overrule head to head wrestling. It don't make a bit of difference who can beat who in any persons mind when its been decided in a fight on the mat. If a wrestler has not lost a match to a lower ranked wrestler and beats your #1 that has lost to your #2 then you rank the wrestler that beat #1 #4 because..... #3 is a very good wrestler?
but decided to not change the rankings based on a post season tournament unless it met the specific criteria.
I should have finished the official announcement before our trip, to clear all of this up.
I must conclude your specific criteria does not include the results of wrestling matches is whats got me confused