1). I would agree that an Standardized Objective Rating System (as opposed to subjective) needs to be developed.

2). I would also agree that National Tournaments (though none the less important) should not play a part in this rating system (I am sure this will lead to discussion ).

Here is my suggestion for what this rating system would look like... (please feel free to comment or criticize as needed :rolleyes: )

Two-Tier System (seperating Open & Novice)

Open Wrestling
A - Placed at State (list placing)
B - Qualified for State (but did not place, list placing at Districts)
C - Advanced (did not qualify for State, list placing at Districts-if qualified, or placing at Subs-if competed)
D - First year Open Wrestler

* Using the placing(s) will help seed the wrestlers fairly - giving highest seed to "A-1" and so on, then "B-1" and so on, then "C-1" and so on, then I guess a drawing for what's left of the "C", then a drawing for the "D".

Novice Wrestling
A - Advanced (second year)
B - Beginner (first year)

Maybe this could be one system for all wrestlers, but the point I am trying to get across is that a distinction should be made between a State medalist and a first year wrestler. As far as the "middle of the road wrestlers", you could go crazy trying to seperate all the variables there (and, is it even needed?).

I have not been in this sport for very long, and do not claim to know anything, but I do feel that anything that can be done to make the system better is a great thing. Whatever is decided should be based on the K.I.S.S. principle.

Thank you for your time and consideration.