The main point with my post (clearly I missed it) was that you can't judge whether a kid is "one of the best" Kansas has ever produced until his career is done. If a kid (be it Neal or anyone else) doesn't win a State title but then goes on to win on the next level then you have to consider that in determining if he is one of the best ever. And no one has still answered the question: would you personally rather be a 4 time high school state champion or a 1 time NCAA chamption. Forget about whether Neal will win one. Which is more prestigous to you?
