I think there is a different set of standards at work with a private school. For example Shawnee Mission schools have a zero tolerance for drug and alcohol use. If a Shawnee Mission athlete violates the rule he is out period, across the board, no exceptions. The coach has no control, it is policy. I think that coaches at private schools may have more latitude to tailor rules to individuals. I know in the past a private school was very lienent with one of their best wrestlers when he was caught using alcohol. I would guess that the coach has the same control over other issues such as cutting weight, and academics etc. I know of wrestlers who perceive there to be an unfair advantage and though willing to compete during the regular season, resent it come time for Regional and State tournaments. I suppose that may be an issue contributing to Oklahoma's policy. I think that most parents do their best to provide their children with the greatest possible enviornment to succeed. Some parent's top priority may be academics, or ethics while anothers are sports, but in all of these scenarios private schools have alot to offer. What is best for the kids going to school and wrestling is what is important. Private schools operate independently from public schools, and as such are not financed or operated by local authority or government.I am sure most of their patrons see this as an advantage for their kids. Is it too unfair? Probably not, but I think all schools should maintain the highest possible standards, and compete under the same rules, especially when the kids are all rivals, striving for the same prize. I don't however blame the parents for doing what they feel is best for their kids.