I agree mostly with Nigel. I really dont think that coaches use the Journal as one of the criteria for recruiting. Some of the picks that are made do not really make a lot of sense. Yes, granted, many are deserving and it is a great honor to be on the first, second, third, or honorable mention lists, but it is just someones unprofessional opion. These guys at the Journal are not considering everything that most of us would consider. I still would like to know how many people are in on the selection process and what they use for the criteria. This is not a slam to the Journal either. THanks.