The basis for her law suit deals with a one year head coach in football making 60 and her making 40 and her perceived slights by administration relating to her program vs. the football program and to a lesser degree some other mens sports. That is exactly the premis of her law suit. I have a pretty good understanding of that type of suit. Now the text of our argument took a few different turns which I have barely been able to keep up with. The fact that you are a woman commenting on a wrestling board has a very real significance in that you are trying to stradle some fence between appeasement of this board in sort of a half hearted critisizm of Title IX and some notion that you being a woman has nothing to do with the idea that "maybe you should shoot womens athletes". I am baised because I am a man and I am a life long wrestling person, I admit that and I am not trying to hide here and say I am not. Now come on fess up.... come out come out wherever you are...