All of you criticize Knox and make it seem as if he is a horrible person because of his attitude, then you allude to the fact that Kansas Newman has "high academic standards."

Who are you to judge Knox, or any other wrestler for that matter? How do you know that he doesn't perform the same way in the classroom as he does when he's on that mat? Have all of you looked at his ACT or SAT scores, his class schedule, or his report card? As far as I know, Knox has never been academically ineligible, and was only suspended after missing a match, not for disciplinary reasons. (FYI: Zack Morris, the prototypical slacker, scored a 1590 on his SATs and was admitted to Yale.)

Sequoya Hill once stole a bike (so the rumor goes) and had to be disciplined by the school, missing regionals and state. Would it be better for him to leave Wichita as well? Is he a 'seed?' I think most would argue that Sequoya is a good kid who made a mistake, and I would agree.

Most of you criticize Knox simply because he's from Wichita West, has never been under a coach who emphasized sportsmanship, and perhaps because he's an African American. While I don't think he's a saint by any means, I think it's wrong for all of you to infer that he couldn't cut it at Kansas Newman, because you don't know his background. Give the kid a freaking chance.