Here's something to think about---

Why in the hell does a kids tournament feel the need to select "Outstanding Wrestlers"??? These are KIDS and all it does is stir up bad feelings...

It's hard enough at high school tournaments where a coach is in charge of up to 14 of his own wrestlers...He doesn't have a whole lot of time to watch other matches, until maybe the semifinals...

How can you expect a kids coach, who may have 50 or more kids under his wing, or a tournament director and/or staff who may have to keep track of upwards of 500 matches (if not more) to select an "Outstanding Wrestler"...

If you feel like an award should be given out, don't call it "Outstanding Wrestler", call it "Most pins in the least amount of time" or something to the effect...That way it is subjective and there shouldn't be any question as to who wins it....Though this could open up a can of worms...You can add stipulations of the wrestler has to compete in at least 3 matches, has to be a champion and has to have won all matches by pin...

Just an opinion of a former wrestler and coach...