So what you are saying Mike is that stalling should not be called in overtime when it is going to mean the match for one wrestler or another? You suggest that the rules should be suspended in lieu of what is best for spectators. How far do we let this go? Should we let one wrestler run around the mat and hide from the other wrestler?

Im not saying that is what happened in this match, but you and alot of other people are of an opinion that is inconsistant with the very rules that I hear people whining about all the time. I know Chris personally and have spoken with him several times. Him and Ross Taplin used to wrestle each other back in the day. I think he is a great wrestler and either one of those kids could have won the match. But it really makes me upset when people get on here and say negative things about a call that an official makes that is consistant with the rules, just because it "decides that match".

Honestly Mike where do you draw that line? How many times does a wrestler have to be backed off a match before you call stalling?