2005 3a semi final between Lamar Silver Lake and Tyler West Elk. Two great wrestlers. Went to double OT. Lamar put Tyler on his back. Ref gave verbal 3 count maybe even got to 4. Lamar got up knowing by rule he won and was excited. Ref decided to award escape rather than back points. Tyler wins. Ref was heard saying he didn't like the fact that Lamar let Tyler up. That's worse than giving a stalling point with 2 seconds left to give a kid a win only because the ref can claim it fit the rules. But that was a pretty bad one with Strawn v Sutton-Kern also. The reason I think these are bad is because it really isn't about judgement it is a ref deciding who he wants to win the match.